Makers ‘Blind Married’ refute criticism of Christophe: “We are sure that Brecht and Dziubi did not experience this” | BLIND MARRIED

TVThere is currently a lot to do about a statement by Christophe Ramont. Theformer ‘Blind Married’ face expressed on Twitter that he does not agree withthe way Dziubi and Brecht are portrayed. He criticized, among other things,”the toxic image that even if two men marry, there is a male and a female”.Meanwhile, the makers of the program also responded to the situation. “We havealways taken into account Brecht and Dziubi and what made them feel good.”

The discussion arose after some statements by Christophe on Twitter. “So thegentlemen are allowed to speak at the wedding. Wow, we are 2022,” it sounded.”Extra painful and what I have always resisted: the toxic image that even whentwo men get married there is a male and a female, apparently Dziubi is thefemale.” He was referring mainly to the first episode, where the group wassplit in two. The brides were separated from their grooms, and Dziubi wasassigned to the group with the ladies, while the traditional roles wereretained, with one of the men waited at ‘the altar’, and the other walkedtowards it.Dziubi was also carried over the threshold by Brecht.

(Read more below the tweet.)

Christophe Ramont > @c_ramont >

You cannot view this content

This content includes cookies from social media or other external platforms.Because you have disabled these cookies, this content will remain hidden.Please accept social media cookies to still display the content.

Open privacy settings

Good communication

However, according to the makers of ‘Blind Married’, everything has been welldiscussed in advance. “It was important to us that everyone felt comfortable.We never created the ‘male-female’ image. Brecht and Dziubi have neverexperienced this either,” said a producer.

He also explains that the new concept made it necessary to divide thecandidates into two groups. “We thought it was important that the candidateshad already seen each other beforehand, especially because such a big weddingwas to follow. The division of the two groups has been proposed in advance.Everyone agreed. There have been no further questions about that.”

Watch: Ex-participant Christophe lashes out at TV makers ‘Blindly married’

Other decisions have also always been made in consultation with the duo. “Whenit comes to the ceremony, Dziubi has indicated that he would rather wait atthe altar. The same applies to the speeches. We asked them who would like tosay something. In the end, it was Brecht who wanted to take this on,” itsounds further to the makers. “There is really no line. It is not ourintention to portray anyone in any particular way.”

No underlying message

The makers indicate that they understand why Christophe feels this way. “Butif you look further at the program, it becomes even clearer that there is noline. There is no underlying message. Nothing has been done on purpose to makepeople appear a certain way. Something that is nicely refuted by Dziubihimself.”

Dziubi, who gave his yes to Brecht in the current season of ‘Blind Married’,confirms in an interview with Showbits that he has indeed never experiencedthe situation that way. “I never followed through on that,” it sounds, amongother things. “I get it, but actually everything is very natural and set upwithout premeditation.” The moment Brecht carried him over the threshold wasalso spontaneous: “Brecht thought that was symbolic.”

(Read more below the tweet.)

Christophe Ramont > @c_ramont >

You cannot view this content

This content includes cookies from social media or other external platforms.Because you have disabled these cookies, this content will remain hidden.Please accept social media cookies to still display the content.

Open privacy settings

Christophe, who does not want to elaborate further on the story, is notexclusively negative. He also clearly follows the course of Brecht and Dziubi.”Praise to the production for putting Lady Gaga in the background during thestory of Brecht and Dziubi… Wipe away a tear,” it sounded on Twitter afterMonday’s episode.